In the immediate aftermath of the border crossing, Ukraine and its Western allies unleashed a barrage of threats. Valentin Nalyvaichenko, who heads Ukraine’s security service, stated that the act constitutes a “direct invasion.” NATO condemned the move on Friday, slamming Russia for “a blatant breach of Russia’s international commitments” and insinuating that the convoy may not carry humanitarian goods. Meanwhile, a Pentagon spokesperson strongly condemned the decision to move the convoy and issued a vague threat to Russia that it will face “costs” if it does not withdraw immediately.
Russia’s Foreign ministry on Friday, meanwhile, declared that any attack on the convoy would constitute a criminal act.
Critics warn that heightened rhetoric from the West obscures the role that Ukraine, the U.S., and their allies have played in stoking the current violence and militarization of the region and reviving Cold War divisions.
Click Here: cheap Cowboys jersey
Stephen Zunes, professor of politics and international studies at the University of San Francisco, told Common Dreams, “If U.S. and Western governments have evidence that indicates this is not a legitimate aid convoy, they should make it public. Assuming the worst in this situation is essentially giving license to the Ukrainian government to escalate.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.